|
DIAMON-FUSION: TEST RESULTS
The following are test results from Dr. William C. LaCourse, Professor
of Glass Science at the Institute for Glass Science and Engineering
at Alfred University, New York, an independent testing laboratory.
Dr. LaCourse is an expert in the study of glass and ceramics.
He has done testing for major companies like PPG and Kohler. Below
is a summary of the most important findings of his tests.
Dr. LaCourse states in his reports that our improved
process has a remarkably low coefficient of friction when the
glass is wet. He states that when glass is wet, it is by far the
"most dangerous period" with regards to the potential
for damage. The report says that "we believe that the (main)
usefulness of your coating lies in its maintenance of a low friction
coating over the life of the glass". Below is a formula that
puts into layman's terms the results of the coefficient of friction
tests.
Contact Angle

Untreated Glass

Treated with
Diamon-Fusion (DF1- Step #1)

Treated with
Diamon-Fusion (DF2- Step #2) |
Contact
angle:
Contact angle is the scientific method of measuring
the water repellency of a surface. The higher the number,
the higher the water repellency of the surface.
| Material |
Angle |
| Contact Angle Untreated Glass |
14° |
| Improved Diamon-Fusion® |
106° |
| Our main competitor |
91° |
The latest improvement of the Diamon-Fusion
technology has an additional 2nd step that creates the
'capping' (in the chain of atoms) which changes the molecular
composition of the treated surface.
(Since Dr. Lacourse ran these tests the
process has been improved again and now it consistently
tests out at 116°-118°)
|
Coefficient of Friction:
(with Glass indentor wet)
| Material |
µ |
| Untreated Glass |
0.82 |
| Improved Diamon-Fusion® |
0.13 |
|
|
To make the test results for coefficient of friction
useful, we have used a formula that translates the data into the
force required to cause damage to the surface. Assume that a load
of 10 lbs. has been placed on the rider under static conditions,
and that this is the lowest load that caused cracking (no dragging).
Using the formula we can now calculate the load that would cause
cracking to occur when the rider is dragged across the sample.
back
to top
Load required to damage surface:
| Material |
Load (lbs) |
| Untreated Glass |
0.37 |
| Improved Diamon-Fusion® |
4.00 |
Note that when comparing wet vs. wet friction
calculations indicate that it would take more than 10 times the
load (4.0 lbs. vs. 0.37 lbs.) to cause damage on your treated
sample vs. the untreated.
In other words, the weight of a debris particle
required to crack a piece of glass that has been treated with
Diamon-Fusion® would need to be ten times heavier than the
weight required to crack an untreated piece of glass.
This piece of 5/16" Clear Laminated Glass
was treated on the left side only and shot 20 times, alternating
sides, with an air powered B-B gun from 50 feet. The amazing results
show that while the treated side may be damaged, the majority
of the shots bounced off with no damage and the only break is
considered to be a "repairable" break by most windshield
repair companies. The untreated side, on the other hand, broke
almost every time with the majority of the breaks unrepairable.
Our "big boy" competitors can't say this!
back to top
Designed by Trade
Publishing
|